新东方在线网络课堂 考研 新东方在线 > 考研 > 考研英语 > 考研英语阅读理解 > 正文


2017-11-14 14:46:03 来源:网络考研资料下载

  Music and Chess Do Not Enhance Cognitive Ability


  Most parents want their children to reach their academic potential, and they’re willing to go through great effort and expense to help them achieve that goal. In recent years, a number of researchers have offered evidence suggesting that two activities in particular are especially effective at improving children’s cognitive abilities. These are playing chess and learning a musical instrument. But before sending your kid to chess club or band camp, please read on.

  很多家长希望孩子挖掘学术潜力,他们愿意花费巨大的努力和巨额的学费去帮孩子们实现这一目标。近年,大量研究表明 ,这参与这两项运动(下棋和学乐器)能够显著提高孩子的认知能力。然而,在送你的孩子去象棋俱乐部和乐队营之前,请先看看这篇文章。

  Scientists understand that it can be difficult to assess the significance of a single study in isolation. They prefer waiting for other researchers to replicate experiments before accepting reported effects as valid. Of course, scientists are also human, and naturally they want to promote their pet theories. But collectively, scientists try to keep each other’s biases in check.


  Journalists, in contrast, have less interest in scientific objectivity. Instead, they want to report on a hot story before they get scooped. And studies that show children getting a cognitive boost from learning chess or a musical instrument make for good copy. So parents, who get their information about the latest research on child-rearing from the mainstream media, can easily be duped by shoddy science.


  In a recent article, British psychologists Giovanni Sala and Fernand Gobet report on two meta-analyses they recently performed. (A meta-analysis is a statistical procedure for comparing and contrasting the data from a large number of studies.) These researchers evaluated the existing evidence on whether playing chess or music boosts children’s cognitive abilities or academic performance.


  Usually when researchers begin exploring a new topic, some studies will find the proposed effect and others won’t. Or, some studies will find a big effect, while others find only a little one. A meta-analysis can find the overall trends in massive amounts of data, and it can also identify whether each study is likely to have produced reliable results.


  Studies have conclusively shown that children who play chess or a musical instrument score higher on intelligence tests than their peers who don’t. So, maybe there’s good reason to think these activities are cognitive boosters. But we have to keep in mind that these studies are correlational, and that correlation does not imply causation. It’s also possible that smart kids are simply attracted to intellectually demanding tasks like chess and music.


  The idea that playing chess or a musical instrument can boost general intelligence or academic performance is based on a concept known as transfer of learning. This is the idea that skills learned in one area automatically carry over to another area. For example, educators long believed that the rigors of learning Latin would help students in their math courses. In 1901, noted psychologists Edward Thorndike and Robert Woodworth conducted a series of experiments on the transfer of learning that exposed this false belief for what it was.

  下象棋或演奏乐器可以提高一般智力或学习成绩的想法是基于一个被称为学习迁移的概念。这个概念表明:在一个领域学习到的技能可以自动的转移到另一个领域。例如,教育工作者长期以来认为,学习拉丁语会对学生学习数学课程有帮助。 1901年,著名的心理学家爱德华.桑代克和罗伯特.伍德沃斯进行了一系列关于学习迁移的实验,揭示了这种错误的观念。

  What Thorndike and Woodworth found was that if two tasks are similar, some abilities can transfer from one task to the other. They called this near transfer. So, if you already know Latin, it will make learning Italian much easier, because the two are related languages. But far transfer between two unrelated fields simply doesn’t occur. For example, learning Latin doesn’t help you understand algebra or geometry.


  Thorndike and Woodworth thought they’d laid the mistaken notion of far transfer to rest. But alas, hope springs eternal. The idea that one task can train your brain to make you smarter overall is just too appealing to give up. And so Sala and Gobet conducted their meta-analyses to determine whether Thorndike and Woodworth had dismissed the idea of far transfer too soon.

  桑代克和伍德沃斯原以为他们已经消除了对差别性迁移的误解。然而,希望生生不息。“存在一种任务能够全面提高大脑的智能”,这一想法如此诱人,实在是难以舍弃。因此,Sala 与Gobet才开展了荟萃分析,他们想查明桑代克和伍德沃斯是否过早地否认了差异性迁移这一观点。

  The first meta-analysis examined a wide range of studies reporting on whether music instruction impacts overall academic performance. What Sala and Gobet found was that the size of the effect decreased as the experiment became more tightly controlled. In other words, researchers who used slipshod methods generally found big boosts in academic performance, whereas those who used stringent procedures found little or no academic advantage to learning a musical instrument. A second meta-analysis of studies looking at chess and school performance yielded similar results.


  Sala and Gobet concluded that neither chess nor music is a cognitive booster, as has often been claimed. They also cite other studies that have likewise found no increase in general cognitive abilities for people who play video games, in spite of recent reports in the press to the contrary.


  More than a century after Thorndike and Woodworth reported their seminal studies on the transfer of learning, claims of brain boosters still abound. However, this most recent analysis of the data merely confirms what psychologists have already known for more than a century, namely that far transfer simply doesn’t occur. Playing video games doesn’t boost your memory or attention outside of the game. And making children play chess or music doesn’t make them smarter.


  If your child shows an interest in chess or music—or soccer or computers or any other cognitively demanding pursuit—by all means encourage it. These are all engaging activities worth pursuing in their own right. But don’t foist these “brain boosting” tasks upon them. If you do, your child is more likely to develop a general dislike for learning, in a sense “busting” their brains instead of “boosting” them.



本文关键字: 考研英语阅读 2018考研



联报特惠 【签约】2019考研英语全程班(一、二可选) ¥1490 免费试听
【签约】2019考研数学全程班 ¥890 免费试听
【签约】2019考研政治全程班 ¥990 免费试听
考研公共课 英语 英语二 公共日语 政治 数学 数学零基础
考研专业课 西医专硕中医综合计算机 经济学管理学心理学 教育学历史学 二外日语
专业硕士 法律硕士(法学)法律硕士(非法学)MBA会计硕士教育硕士翻译硕士汉硕 金融硕士


  • 2019考研政治新大纲全程班


  • 2019考研大纲解析&百日规划


  • 2019考研艺术概论高效全程班


  • 2019考研计算机新大纲全程班


  • 2019考研经济学通用高效全程班


  • 2019考研中外美术史高效全程班


  • 2019考研和声曲式高效全程班


  • 2019考研中西方音乐史高效全程班



考研交流 • 下载


考研实用 • 工具



新东方在线张云天解析2019考研政治大纲 w 17分10秒
1 新东方在线张云天解析2019考研政治大纲
新东方在线徐涛解析2019考研政治大纲 w 20分00秒
2 新东方在线徐涛解析2019考研政治大纲
新东方在线桑宏斌解析2019考研政治大纲 w 16分16秒
3 新东方在线桑宏斌解析2019考研政治大纲
新东方在线阮晔解析2019考研政治大纲 w 32分38秒
4 新东方在线阮晔解析2019考研政治大纲
新东方在线郝明解析2019考研政治大纲 w 15分05秒
5 新东方在线郝明解析2019考研政治大纲